Info Doctcare Services : India's Largest Professional Risk Management Service Provider for Doctors, Hospitals,Nursing Homes & Diagnostic Centers

OFFER Get upto 75% Discount on Premium !! Buy Now

"Supreme Court Orders Surgeon to Compensate Patient ₹3.5 Lakh for Post-Cataract Surgery Infection"

Written by: Doctcare services- Legal Team |
Writer Name: Advocate, Arpit Singh
Created on: 2025-03-06 13:17:11
image

Background - Bherulal, the complainant, underwent a cataract surgery by Dr. Madhusudan. Post-surgery, he developed severe pain, oozing from the eye, and eventually complete vision loss. Multiple specialists later diagnosed him with endophthalmitis (a severe infection).

Supreme Court’s Findings:

  1. The doctor failed to properly diagnose and treat the infection despite multiple complaints from the patient
  2. No credible evidence proved the patient changed his dressing; the doctor’s records were suspiciously produced late and lacked reliabilit
  3. Expert opinion showed that oozing pus indicated serious infection needing urgent care, which the doctor neglected.
  4. The Supreme Court restored the State Commission’s decision, awarded ₹3.5 lakh compensation to Bherulal’s legal heirs, and imposed 12% interest if unpaid within two months

In short: The doctor was held negligent for failing to diagnose and treat a post-surgery infection, leading to total vision loss.

Editorial

NCDRC Upholds Medical Negligence: Doctor Liable for Forceps Delivery Injuries to Newborn View Pdf
Supreme Court : Cheque Bounce Complainant Is 'Victim', Can Appeal Acquittal Without Prior Leave The Supreme Court holds that complainants under Section 138 NI Act qualify as “victims” under CrPC, allowing them to appeal acquittals directly under the proviso to Section 372. View Pdf
Hospital and Doctor Held Guilty of Medical Negligence; Patna Consumer Commission Awards ₹36 Lakh for Retained Stent Post-Surgery View Pdf
The Karnataka High Court - High Court Quashes Medical Negligence Case Against Doctors for Lack of Expert Opinion View Pdf
Supreme Court Of India quashed the charge of culpable homicide (Section 304, Part 1 of the IPC) against a doctor who gave telephonic instruction to a nurse to administer an injection, which led to a patient's death due to an adverse reaction. View Pdf
NCDRC : Doctors Not Liable If Treatment Follows Recognized Medical Practice Complaint Dismissed Against Eye Specialists Over Alleged Steroid-Induced Cataract View Pdf
Supreme Court of India —"We have sympathy for the appellant, but sympathy cannot translate into a legal remedy"—highlights a key principle in judicial reasoning: decisions must be grounded in law and not in emotion. The Supreme Court bench, comprising Justice L. Nageswara Rao and Justice Sanjay Kishan Kaul, essentially reinforced that sympathy alone is not sufficient to establish legal liability, particularly in complex domains like medical negligence View Pdf
Supreme Court of India - "We, therefore, direct that whenever a complaint is received against a doctor or hospital by the Consumer Fora (whether District, State or National) or by the Criminal Court, then before issuing notice to the doctor or hospital against whom the complaint is made, the Consumer Forum or Criminal Court should first refer the matter to a competent doctor or a committee of doctors specialized in the field relating to which the medical negligence is attributed. Only after that doctor or committee reports that there is a prima facie case of medical negligence should notice be issued to the concerned doctor/hospital. View Pdf
NCDRC has directed Dr. Anirban Chatterjee, a vascular surgeon, and Nightingale Diagnostic & Medicare Centre Pvt. Ltd., Kolkata, to jointly and severally pay ₹ 75 lakh in compensation to a 17-year-old patient who lost her right leg due to medical negligence during a surgical procedure View Pdf
Section 138, Negotiable Instruments Act – Andhra Pradesh High Court Holds That Lok Adalat Award in Criminal Proceedings for Cheque Dishonour is Executable as a Civil Court Decree. View Pdf
The West Bengal State Commission, led by Justice Manojit Mandal, found a doctor guilty of medical negligence and poor service for failing to get the patient's written consent before starting the treatment. View Pdf
NCDRC Dismisses Medical Negligence Claim Against Kims Al-Shifa Hospital View Pdf
"Supreme Court Orders Surgeon to Compensate Patient ₹3.5 Lakh for Post-Cataract Surgery Infection" View Pdf

About Company

Services

Medical Negligence

2025 Info Doctcare Services Pvt. Ltd.